References

1. Breen, J. (1997) Overview Of International Car Crash Performance Ratings, Paper presented to International Symposium on Real World Crashes, CCIS, Loughborough, 1997
2. Broughton, J., Allsop, R.E., Lynam, D.A. and McMahon, C.M. (2000) The Numerical Context for Setting National Casualty Reduction Targets, Crowthorne, Transport Research Laboratory Ltd. TRL Report No. 382
3. Cameron, M., Narayan, S., Newstead, S., Ernvall ,T., Laine, V. and Langwieder. K. (2001) Comparative Analysis Of Several Vehicle Safety Rating Systems, ESV Paper Number 2001-S4-O-68
4. Castle, J., Lynam, D., Scoons, J., and Lawson, S..D. (2007) EuroRAP Road Protection Score – UK trials Final report EuroRAP December 2007
5. Commission of the European Communities (2000) Priorities in EU road safety: progress report and ranking of actions. COM(2000)125 final. Brussels
6. Consumers Association, The Secondary Safety Rating System for Cars. London (1993) IT, The European Secondary Safety Rating System for Cars. London: International Testing, 1994
7. Department of Transport (1995) Choosing Safety, 1996 edition, HMSO, London
8. Department of Transport (1991) Cars: Make and Model: The risk of driver injury and car accident rates in Great Britain: 1991, HMSO, London
9. ETSC (1995) Consumer information on the crash performance of cars: The role of the EU, European Transport Safety Council, Brussels
10. European Commission, DG Transport, http://europa.eu.int/comm/transport/road/roadsafety/equipment/euroncap/index_en.htm
11. Fails, A. and Minton, R. Comparison of EuroNCAP assessments with injury causation in accidents, TRL Ltd, Crowthorne, Berkshire Document number 319, 2001
12. Hackney, J.J. and Quarles, V. (1982) NHTSA The New Car Assessment Program – status and effect. National Highway Safety Administration
13. Hackney, J. ,Kahane, C., & Chan, R. National Highway Traffic Safety Adminstration, Activities of the New Car Assessment Program in the United States, 15th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Melbourne, Australia, May 1996
14. Hägg, A., Kamrén, B.V,. Koch, M., Lie, A., Malmstedt, C., Nygren, A., and Tingvall, C. (1992) Folksam Car Model Safety Rating 1991-92, Folksam Research, Stockholm, 1992
15. Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI), Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 1975
16. IT (1994) The European Secondary Safety Rating System for Cars. London: International Testing
17. Koornstra, M. et al. (2002) SUNflower: a comparative study of the development of road safety in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. Leischendam, Dutch Institute for Road Safety Research, 2002
18. Larsson, P.,Lie, A., Tingvall, C. (SRA), Krafft, M. &Kullgren, A. Folksam Research, The crash safety of new car models - A comparative accident study of new versus old car models, ESV, 1996
19. Lie ,A. and Tingvall, C. (2002) How do Euro NCAP results correlate with real-life injury risks? A paired comparison study of car-to-car crashes.Traffic Injury Prevention , 2002,3:288 –291
20. Lynam, D., Hummel, T., Barker, J ., and Lawson, S.D. European Road Assessment Programme EuroRAP I (2004) TECHNICAL REPORT, EuroRAP May 2004
21. Lynam, D., Castle, J., Scoons, J., Lawson, S.D. , Hill, J. and Charman, S. (2007) EuroRAP II Technical Report (2005-6) on behalf of the Foundation for Road Safety Research and EuroRAP AISBL, EuroRAP II: AGREEMENT NUMBER – TREN-04-ST-S07.37010, March 2007
22. Newstead, S., Cameron, M. Updated correlation of results from the Australian New Car Assessment programme with real crash data from 1987-1996. MUARC, Report No 52, 1999.
23. Newstead, S., Cameron, M. & Watson, L. (2007) Vehicle safety ratings estimated from police reported crash data: 2007 update Australian and New Zealand crashes during 1987-2005, Monash University Accident
24. Tapio J., Pirtala, P. and Ernvall, T. (1995) The accident involvement and injury risk rates of car models. Oulu: University of Oulu, Road and Transport Laboratory