ERSO
      Home         Knowledge          Data               Links          SafetyNet   
 

References

  1. Aarts, L. & van Schagen, I. (2006).Driving speed and the risk of road crashes: a review. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2, 215-224.
  2. ADONIS (1998) Transport Research Fourth Framework Programme Road Transport VII - 56 : analysis and development of new insight into substitution of short car trips ADONIS by cycling and walking : how to substitute short car trips by cycling and walking. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Eur-OP, Luxembourg.
  3. Avenosos, A. & Beckmann, J. (2005) The safety of vulnerable road users in the southern, eastern and central european countries (The "SEC Belt"). European Transport Safety Council ETSC, Brussels.
  4. AVV (2005). Road safety in The Netherlands: key figures edition 2005. AVV Transport Research Centre, Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Rotterdam.
  5. Bernhoft, I.M. (1998) A qualitative analysis of cyclist and pedestrian accident factors: Analysis and Development Of New Insight into Substitution of Short Car Trips ADONIS, project partly funded by the European Commission under the Transport RTD Programme of the 4th Framework Programme. Rådet for Trafiksikkerhedsforskning RfT (Danish Council for Road Safety Research), Copenhagen.
  6. Bly, P., Dix, M. & Stephenson, C. (1999) Comparative study of European child pedestrian exposure and accidents. MVA Ltd., London.
  7. Broughton, J. (2005) Car Occupant and Motorcyclists Deaths 1994-2002. TRL Report TRL629. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne.
  8. Carole Miller Research (1998) The older child pedestrian casualty. Central research unit, Edinburgh
  9. Clayton, A.B., & Colgan, M.A. (2001) Alcohol and Pedestrians. Road Safety Research Report 20. Department for Transport, London.
  10. CROW (2007) Design manual for bicycle traffic. Record No. 25. Centre for Research and Contract Standardization in Civil and Traffic Engineering C.R.O.W, Ede.
  11. De Jager, D., Torenstra, J., Haas, J. de & Spapé, I. (2006) Veilige kindcorridor in steden; Kindlint zet dit jaar eerste stapjes in Amsterdam en Delft. Verkeerskunde, 57(4), pp. 34-39.
  12. Dijkstra, A. et al. (1998) Best practice to promote cycling and walking: Analysis and Development Of New Insight into Substitution of Short Car Trips ADONIS. Danish Road Directorate DRD, Copenhagen.
  13. Duperrex, O., Bunn, F., & Roberts, I. (2002) Safety education of pedestrians for injury prevention: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal, 324, pp. 1129-1133.
  14. EC DGXI (1999) Cycling: the way ahead for towns and cities. Directorate General XI, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
  15. ECF (1998) Improving bicycle safety without making helmet-use compulsory. European Cyclists' Federation, Brussels, Belgium.
  16. ECMT (2000) Safety in road traffic for vulnerable users Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD, Paris.
  17. Edwards G. (1998) The development and promotion of measures for vulnerable road users with regard to mobility integrated with safety. Pedal cyclist. Project report PR/SE/441/98, contribution to Promising, TRL Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Great Britain.
  18. Elvik, R. (1999) Cost-benefit analysis of safety measures for vulnerable and inexperienced road users: Workpackage 5 of EU-project Development and Promotion of Measures to Reduce the Risks of Injury to Vulnerable Road Users and Inexperienced Drivers and Riders PROMISING (Promotion of Measures for Vulnerable Road Users). Institute of Transport Economics TOI, Oslo.
  19. ETSC (1995) Reducing traffic injuries resulting from excess and inappropriate speed. European Transport Safety Council ETSC, Brussels.
  20. ETSC (1999) Safety of pedestrians and cyclists in urban areas. European Transport Safety Council ETSC, Brussels.
  21. ETSC (2003) ETSC position on the Commission proposal on pedestrian protection. European Transport Safety Council ETSC, Brussels.
  22. ETSC (2005) The safety of vulnerable road users in the Southern, Eastern, and Central European countries (The “SEC Belt”). European Transport Safety Council ETSC, Brussels.
  23. Forward, S. et al. (1998) Behavioural factors affecting modal choice: Analysis and Development Of New Insight into Substitution of Short Car Trips ADONIS, a research project of the European Union Transport RTD Programme.·Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute VTI, Linköping.
  24. Goldenbeld, Ch. (1992) Ongevallen van oudere fietsers in 1991 [Accidents of older cyclists in 1991]. R-92-71. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam.
  25. Goudswaard, A.P. & Janssen, E.G. (1990) Passieve veiligheid bedrijfsvoertuigen; Een literatuuronderzoek. [Passive safety of commercial vehicles; a literature study]. (In Dutch). TNO-report 754080030. TNO Road-Vehicles Research Institute IW-TNO, Delft.
  26. Hansen, F. (1995) Cyclist’s safety in Europe; A comparison between selected European studies. Rådet for Trafiksikkerhedsforskning, Gentofte, Denmark.
  27. Hummel, T. (1999) Dutch pedestrian safety research review. FHWA-RD-99-092. Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center Research and Development, Federal Highway Administration FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation DOT, McLean, VA.
  28. Hydén, C., Nilsson, A. & Risser, R. (1998) WALCYNG: how to enhance WALking and CYcliNG instead of shorter car trips and to make these modes safer : final report. Lund Bulletin No. 165. Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, University of Lund, Lund.
  29. Kampen, L.T.B. van & Schoon, C.C. (1999) De veiligheid van vrachtauto’s; Een ongevals- en maatregelenanalyse in opdracht van Transport en Logistiek Nederland. [The safety of lorries; An accident and measures analysis commissioned by the Dutch Transport Operators Association]. (In Dutch). R-99-31. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam.
  30. Karkhaneh, M., Kalenga, J-C., Hagel, B.E., & Rowe, B.H. (2006) Effectiveness of bicycle helmet legislation to increase helmet use: a systematic review. Injury Prevention, 12, pp. 76-82.
  31. Kloeden, C. N., McLean, A. J., Moore, V. M. & Ponte, G. (1997) Travelling speed and the rate of crash involvement. Volume 1: findings. Report No. CR 172. Federal Office of Road Safety FORS, Canberra
  32. Kloeden, C. N., Ponte, G. & McLean, A. J. (2001) Travelling speed and the rate of crash involvement on rural roads. Report No. CR 204. Australian Transport Safety Bureau ATSB, Civic Square, ACT
  33. Lynam, D., Nilsson, G., Morsink, P., Sexton, B., Twisk, D.A.M., Goldenbeld, C. & Wegman, F.C.M. (2005) An extended study of the development of road safety in Sweden, United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. Leidschendam, SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research / Crowthorne, Berkshire, Transport Research Laboratory TRL / Linköping, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute VTI.
  34. OECD (1998) Safety of vulnerable road users. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD, Paris.
  35. OECD (2004) Keeping children safe in traffic . Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD, Paris.
  36. Oxley, J., Corben, B., Fildes, B., O'Hare, M. & Rothengatter, T. (2004) Older vulnerable road users: measures to reduce crash and injury risk. MUARC Report No. 218. Accident Research Centre MUARC, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria.
  37. Pasanen, E. (1991). Ajonopeudet ja jalankulkijan turvallisuus [Driving speeds and pedestrian safety]. Teknillinen korkeakoulu, Liikennetekniikka, Espoo.
  38. PROMISING (2001a) Measures for pedestrian safety and mobility problems. Final report of Workpackage 1 of the European research project PROMISING (Promotion of Measures for Vulnerable Road Users), Deliverable D1. National Technical University of Athens NTUA, Athens.
  39. PROMISING (2001b) Measures to promote cyclist safety and mobility. Final report of Workpackage 2 of the European research project PROMISING (Promotion of Measures for Vulnerable Road Users), Deliverable D2. Technical Research Centre of Finland VTT, Espoo.
  40. PROMISING (2001c) Cost-benefit analysis of measures for vulnerable road users. Final report of Workpackage 5 of the European research project PROMISING (Promotion of Measures for Vulnerable Road Users), Deliverable D5. Transport Research Laboratory TRL, Crowthorne, Berkshire.
  41. Robinson, D.L. (2007) Bicycle helmet legislation: Can we reach a consensus? Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, pp. 86-93.
  42. Ryley, T., Halliday, M. & Emmerson, P. (1998) Toucan crossings; Trials of nearside equipment. TRL Report No. 331. Transport Research Laboratory TRL, Crowthorne, Berkshire.
  43. Schoon, C.C. (1996) Invloed kwaliteit fiets op ongevallen; Een ongevallenanalyse aan de hand van een schriftelijke enquête [Impact of bicycle quality on accidents]. R-96-32. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam.
  44. Schoon, C.C. (2004) Botsingen van het type 'fietser - autofront'; Factoren die het ontstaan en de letselernst beïnvloeden [Cyclist-car front collisions; Factors that influence occurrence and injury severity]. R-2003-33. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam.
  45. Sentinella, J., & Keigan, M. (2005) Young adolescent pedestrians' and cyclists' road deaths: analysis of police accident files. Prepared for the Department for Transport, Road Safety Division. TRL Report ; No. 620 Transport Research Laboratory TRL, Crowthorne, Berkshire.
  46. Summersgill, I. Kennedy, J.V. & Baynes, D. (1996). Accidents at three-arm priority junctions on urban single-carriageway roads. TRL Report PR184. Transport Research Laboratory TRL, Crowthorne.
  47. SWOV (2004) Bicycle facilities on road segments and intersections of distributor roads. SWOV Fact sheet. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam.
  48. SWOV (2005) Crossing facilities for cyclists and pedestrians. SWOV Fact sheet. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam.
  49. SWOV (2006a) Pedestrians. SWOV Fact sheet. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam.
  50. SWOV (2006b) Cyclists. SWOV Fact sheet. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam.
  51. SWOV (2006c) Vulnerable road users. SWOV Fact sheet. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam.
  52. Tight, M.R., Carsten, O.M.J., Kirby, H.R., Southwell, M.T. & Leake, G.R. (1996). A review of road safety research on children as pedestrians: How far can we go towards improving their safety? IATSS Research, 20(2), pp. 69-74.
  53. Thompson, D.C., Rivara, F.P. & Thompson, R. (2005). Helmets for preventing head and facial injuries in bicyclists. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4.
  54. Towner, E., Dowswell, T., Burkes, M., Dickinson, H., Towner, J. & Hayes, M. (2002). Bicycle helmets: a review of their effectiveness, a critical rieview of the literature. Road Safety Research Report No. 30. Department for Transport DfT, London.
  55. UNECE (1993) Convention on Road Traffic of 8 November 1968, incorporating the amendments to the Convention which entered into force on 3 September 1993. Inland Transport Committee of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE, Geneva.
  56. Ward, H.J. et al. (1994). Pedestrian activity and accident risk. AA foundation for Road Safety Research, Basingstoke, Hampshire.
  57. Wegman, F.C.M., Dijkstra, A., Schermers, G. & Van Vliet, P. (2005). Sustainable safety in the Netherlands; Evaluation of a national Road Safety Programme. 85th Annual Meeting of the Transport Research Board. TRB, Washington DC.
  58. Wegman, F.C.M. & Aarts, L. (Eds.) (2006) Advancing sustainable safety. Chapter 12: Cyclists and pedestrians (p.155-162). SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam.
  59. WHO (2006) Helmets: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. World Health Organization WHO, Geneva.
  60. Wittink (2001) Promotion of mobility and safety of vulnerable road users: final report of the European research project PROMISING (Promotion of Measures for Vulnerable Road Users). D-2001-3. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam.

Best practice to promote cycling and walking (Dijkstra et al., 1998)

 

This pdf-document contains information about measures which are intended to stimulate cycling and walking so that the number of short car trips will be reduced. In general, two kinds of measures are presented: technical and non-technical measures which are friendly for pedestrians and cyclists. Examples of the first category are good cycle tracks and good crossing facilities. The second kind of measures concern rules and regulations, traffic signals, and public information and education. Each description of a measure is accompanied by illustrations: photos, diagrams of layout designs or other road elements, or illustrations of public information material. Infrastructure measures are sometimes provided with dimensions as well. Next, the advantages and disadvantages of the measures in terms of comfort, costs, safety, and social safety are described in as much detail as possible. Also discussed are the advantages and disadvantages for road users other than pedestrians and cyclists. If possible, a cost estimate is provided. Finally, the names of publications or organisations are listed as sources for more information.

 

The pdf-document is one of the reports of the ADONIS research project. The original title of the project is: Analysis and Development Of New Insight into Substitution of short car trips by cycling and walking. The ADONIS project was commissioned by European Commission as part of the Fourth Framework Programme, and ran from 1 may 1996 until end of 1997.

 

Design manual for bicycle traffic (CROW, 2007)

 

This design manual replaces 'Sign up for the bike' (CROW, 1993). It offers road designers and other interested parties extensive data on how to attain a bicycle-friendly infrastructure. A bicycle-friendly infrastructure is one that allows direct and comfortable cycling in a safe and attractive traffic environment. Only then is it possible to compete with the car. High quality bicycle infrastructures lead to a larger share of bicycles in the modal split. This design manual describes the steps required to achieve such an infrastructure, from the policy plan to promote cycling to the physical implementation of a bicycle-friendly infrastructure.

 
   
 
© 2007 SafetyNet. All rights reserved | Disclaimer | Contact